Nvidia’s board is preparing to oust CEO Jensen Huang amid reports that he had two extramarital affairs, including one with a suspected Chinese spy, the Wall Street Journal reported. The board is getting ready to meet on Huang’s future at the company as soon as today, the report noted, citing unnamed people familiar with the matter. The news comes after the latest reporting from The New York Times said Huang had another extramarital relationship, one that involved a senior executive at Nvidia who reported to him. The company’s shares fell over 7% in after-hours trading following the reports.

NN: A great man. A genus who moved the world forward with his GPU technology. Originally developed for video boards to run more vivid and life like video games. This is beyond stupid. I could care less who he screwed or for that matter who screwed him. The stock gained 7000% under his leadership.

Musk says ‘would be an honor’ to hire Nvidia’s Huang

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk said he would be open to hiring Nvidia chief Jensen Huang, following US media reports that claimed the chipmaker’s board is preparing to remove its longtime executive. “That would be an honor,” Musk said in a brief reply to a post on X asking him if he would hire Nvidia’s scandal-hit CEO. The tech giant’s board is meeting as soon as today to decide whether to oust Huang in response to reports about his two extramarital affairs, the Wall Street Journal said earlier, prompting the company’s shares to drop over 7% in after-hours trading.

NN: Elon Has had 14 children with 4 different women… My man!  this PC shit is out of hand. 

Apples Tim Cook who is a gay turd bugler.  Has had numerous partners the latest being a guy named Mike. Rumors’ have swelled about his dating but the LGBT community along with the press has not reported anything.

The Chinees should have sent Huang a gay spy and they could have kept his affair under the covers

Oil prices rose on Wednesday as the lingering conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine heightened concerns about long-term pressure on global energy markets. The prospects of a negotiated settlement between the United States and Iran remained uncertain, while the latest Ukraine trilateral talks in Abu Dhabi still showed no conclusive breakthrough. Brent for deliveries in January rose 3.31% at 9:27 am ET and sold for $94.64 per barrel, while West Texas Intermediate for deliveries in December jumped 2.86%, selling for $88.5 per barrel.

NN: This is just the start!!!

United States Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently moved from his home to a military base following Iranian threats against his life, the New York Times reported, citing three people with knowledge of the matter. Bessent’s economic pressure campaign against Iran made him one of the US administration officials Iran is most looking to harm, the report said. US officials concluded in recent weeks that Tehran’s plots against both current and former US officials have reached a more advanced stage, the report noted, adding that this conclusion was based in part on intel about threats to Bessent. The severity of the threats made against the treasury secretary isn’t clear, the newspaper reported. It also quoted unnamed US officials as saying that Tehran’s ability to conduct large-scale attacks in the US and other territories overseas is limited.

NN: Can you feel the love. And I am to believe a peace deal is close. Unhook my dick. 

The United States Energy Information Administration (EIA) projected that Brent crude oil spot price will remain near $100 per barrel for the remainder of the year, the agency said in its Short-Term Energy Outlook on Tuesday. The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) is seen to average $88.29 by the end of the year. “Crude oil prices rose for a third consecutive month in October as falling global inventories, attacks on oil tankers in the Persian Gulf, constrained shipping capacity, and higher transportation costs tightened supply,” the EIA underlined, estimating that most production in the Middle East outside Iran will likely return to pre-conflict levels by the middle of the next year. Brent is expected to gradually decline to an average of $77 per barrel in the final quarter of 2027, while WTI is seen at nearly $72 per barrel. Meanwhile, US crude production is forecasted to increase to 14.3 million barrels per day next year, marking a 3% jump from 13.9 million barrels per day in 2026.

NN: They are `predicting a $10 rally without a war

TECHNOLOGY UPDATE

Elon Musk, Starlink, and the science-fiction future that could move artificial intelligence and cloud data centers into outer space

By Nick Guarino  ·  November 10, 2026

THE WORLD IS BUILDING YESTERDAY’S ANSWER TO TOMORROW’S TECHNOLOGY

The biggest technology companies on Earth are racing to spend staggering sums of money on giant data centers. Concrete, steel, land, substations, state of the art CPU processors. Electric transmission lines, Fiber optic internet cable backbone bundles. Water systems and cooling plants: all of this in the name of artificial intelligence. They may be building the most expensive dinosaurs in industrial history.

My prediction is within five years, the economics of computing could begin to turn against these terrestrial mega projects costing trillions in borrowed money. Not because artificial intelligence fails, but because it succeeds so spectacularly that the infrastructure supporting it must be reinvented.

And the man best positioned to do that reinvention work is Elon Musk. He has launch vehicles, electric vehicles, a global satellite network and a direct interest in the future of AI. Put those pieces together and a radical new technology emerges: the AI data centers and the cloud could literally move into the heavens.

THE EARTHBOUND PROBLEM

A modern AI campus consumes land, water and electrical power on a scale that would have been unimaginable for an ordinary office building. Its processors turn nearly all the electricity they use into heat. That heat has to be removed continuously, using pumps, fans, liquid loops, chillers, heat exchangers and, in some designs, water-intensive cooling towers.

Then come the arguments. Who builds the power plants? Who pays for the transmission lines? Who supplies the water? Who wants an industrial-scale computing complex nearby? Environmental objections and local political resistance can slow construction and raise costs. Some concerns are real, while others become convenient slogans. Engineering questions deserve engineering answers, not political theater.

In the not too distant future, the winning answer is not to find a more cooperative town. It is to leave the town – and the planet – behind.

STARLINK IS THE FIRST HALF OF THE PUZZLE

Starlink has already demonstrated the appeal of a constellation of low-Earth-orbit communications satellites. Optical laser intersatellite links allow equipped satellites to relay traffic through space rather than relying on a ground station at every hop. That is a remarkable starting point for a new network architecture.

Now imagine its descendants: far more capable satellites, faster optical links, sophisticated routing, and user devices that communicate more directly with orbiting infrastructure. A request leaves a device, travels through a space based satellite network, reaches an orbital AI cloud computing facility, and returns back to Earth with the answer in seconds.

In this scenario, much of the computing is no longer concentrated in giant buildings on the ground. The network and the processing plant become parts of one orbital system. No Fiber optic cables to link data centers with users. No cell phone towers. No relying upon water resources or the electric grid.

THE COMPUTING FACTORY ABOVE THE CLOUDS

Imagine modular orbital data centers assembled from launchable units: powered by solar arrays, AI accelerators, communications terminals, batteries, shielding, radiators and robotic servicing systems. They would be deployed, expanded and eventually replaced like components of an industrial fleet.

Their attraction is obvious. Sunlight supplies free electrical energy without a terrestrial grid connection. Radiators in the near zero vacuum in space can expel the waste heat from the processor chips without cooling towers or water. There is no neighborhood zoning fight over a server farm land grab.

That does not mean power is free. Launches, spacecraft, solar arrays, energy storage, replacement hardware and operations all cost money. And the vacuum of space is not an effortless refrigerator: with no air to carry heat away, a powerful computer needs extensive radiator surfaces to shed its waste heat as infrared radiation. Those are formidable engineering challenges, not minor details. Both well within reach of current technology.

But the world once considered reusable orbital-class rockets fanciful. The purpose of a technological vision is to ask which apparent impossibilities can become routine engineering.

WHY MUSK COULD HAVE AN ADVANTAGE

Most cloud companies buy launch services from somebody else. Most satellite operators do not design the chips and AI services that would occupy a computing platform. Musk’s business interests bring several of those capabilities unusually close together.

A reusable launch system makes frequent delivery and replacement conceivable. A communications constellation could provide the data transport layer back to users on Earth. AI development has created enormous demand for data centers. And that demand will be met by orbital processing centers in outer space. Musk is building a vertically integrated system: launch, power, networking, computing and delivery to the customer.

It is a master plan of commercial and technical feasibility. Space based AI processing centers operating with an incredible cost advantage on AI campuses in orbit.

THE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC EARTHQUAKE

As orbital computing becomes available with a great cost advantage for at first even a portion of AI workloads, what happens to the companies that committed fortunes to land, transmission infrastructure and giant cooling plants?

The answer will be a dramatic repricing of infrastructure. Most all terrestrial data centers would go broke. Especially where low latency, high bandwidth, data sovereignty and where physical proximity to users matters. The most expandable categories of compute could begin migrating upward in the next few years.

Today’s terrestrial fiber networks, undersea cables, Wi-Fi and cellular systems will simply be rendered unnecessary by satellite based systems. Capacity, physics, latency, spectrum and economics will favor space based networks for many uses. My analysis imagines a world in which future satellite generations of space based data centers will destroy land based infrastructure much faster than anyone presently expects.

THE FIVE-YEAR WAGER

Here is the wager: the real breakthrough will not be a faster processor inside a larger building. It will be a more cost effective place to put the processor – and a new way to connect it to the world.

My timeline: in five years, orbital computing will serve the bulk of AI and cloud computing and storage.

Today’s trillion-dollar borrowed money earth based data centers construction race represents the dumbest investments of our time. The next generation of data centers will not have a street address at all.

The future belongs to the company that can put a computing factory in orbit, power it with limitless sunlight, cool it for free in the vacuum of space, connect it with lasers, service it with rockets and deliver its intelligence directly to users anywhere on Earth. Get this faster, more reliably and cheaper than anyone else.

When that happens, the trillion dollar concrete dinosaurs we are building today will be monuments to a technological age that ended almost as soon as it began. With the biggest loss to investors ever.

Scope and verification

These are my research discoveries on SpaceX and Starlink’s progress on AI data centers in outer space. Including Filing dates, numbers and regulatory actions. Data was taken from identified primary FCC documents where available. Proposed satellite quantities are application ceilings, not satellites actually launched or approved. The research distinguishes filing, acceptance for filing, grant, and operational service.

1 | SpaceX orbital data-center system: primary filing

2 | Existing Starlink Gen2 broadband constellation

3 | Starlink optical intersatellite links

Laser or optical intersatellite links enable satellites to pass traffic between spacecraft, reducing dependence on immediate terrestrial gateways along every route. The orbital-data-center filing explicitly contemplates optical links between its proposed compute satellites and SpaceX Gen1/Gen2 Starlink spacecraft. The engineering proposition is to combine transport and orbital processing, but a laser network does not by itself eliminate all Earth gateways, local Wi-Fi, fiber backbones, undersea cables, or cellular towers.

4 | Direct-to-device / Starlink Mobile

SpaceX began deploying Direct to Cell spacecraft in January 2024. Its February 2025 service report described cooperation with mobile network operators, including use of terrestrial LTE spectrum and direct satellite-to-phone service. The 2025 Starlink progress report reported more than 650 first-generation Direct to Cell satellites and deployments spanning six continents (company-reported figures).

On October 6, 2026, the FCC issued Order DA 26-1078 in docket 25-340 approving a separate SpaceX non-geostationary mobile satellite service system. Industry coverage on October 7 described authority for up to 15,000 direct-to-device satellites, with conditions relating to acquired EchoStar spectrum. This Starlink Mobile system is distinct from the 15,000-satellite Gen2 broadband authorization and the proposed million-satellite orbital-data-center constellation.

5 | Starlink licensing of radio frequencies

When I heard that SpaceX was acquiring 800 MHz radio spectrum I put the pieces together. It’s past the concept phase. Musk is starting to build out space based data centers.

SpaceX is acquiring licensed spectrum rights. Those rights allow satellite transmissions in designated frequency bands, subject to regulatory approval.

The 800 MHz range is particularly valuable because lower-frequency signals do not require satellite antennas, penetrate buildings and obstacles better than higher-frequency signals.

SpaceX’s major spectrum acquisitions

The latest developments are even larger than the original EchoStar agreement.

Transaction values, not completed cash purchases.

The first three bands are part of the EchoStar transaction, which received FCC approval on May 12, 2026. The final transfer to SpaceX is targeted for November 30, 2027.

The 800 MHz acquisition, reported October 8, 2026, involves spectrum from Grain Management. Reuters reported an estimated $8 billion price, with FCC approval still required.

The important point of my research is that SpaceX could eventually control the entire communications chain and computer internet, data processing space: the radio frequencies, satellites, intersatellite laser connections, computing infrastructure, and return path to the customer.

That is a much bigger business opportunity than simply selling satellite internet access.

How the system will work

The spectrum purchases primarily help with the first and last legs of this chain: transmitting information between devices and satellites. Laser links would handle high-capacity communications between satellites and orbital computing facilities.

The FCC approved the EchoStar spectrum assignments on May 12, 2026. EchoStar reports that 50 MHz of AWS-4 and H-Block spectrum, plus 5–15 MHz of AWS-3 spectrum depending on geographic area, are involved. The initial transfer to a trust occurred May 22, with the final SpaceX transfer targeted for November 30, 2027.

SpaceX also filed an application for up to one million orbital data-center satellites, at altitudes of 500–2,000 kilometers. The FCC accepted that application for review on February 4, 2026, under filing SAT-LOA-20260108-00016. Acceptance for review does not constitute approval to deploy the constellation.

SpaceX is pursuing two complementary capabilities: direct-to-device spectrum and orbital computing infrastructure. Together, they could eventually allow AI requests to travel from a phone to an orbital processor and back without relying on a conventional terrestrial data center for that particular computation.

That is a credible technological direction. Terrestrial data centers, fiber networks or cellular towers will become obsolete within five years.

Spectrum ownership could give SpaceX the first and last links in the chain, connecting phones to satellites without cell towers or satellite antennas. Then the Starlink laser links could carry signals between satellites and, eventually, computing cloud and AI platforms in orbit. SpaceX could eventually control spectrum, satellites, and computing infrastructure as one integrated system. That could let a phone or desktop computer send an AI request to an orbital processor and receive the result without using a terrestrial data center for that particular calculation. It’s not ready yet, but it’s definitely the direction the technology will take.

6 | Other orbital-data-center proposals and competing filings

An October 1, 2026 legal review identified four FCC-accepted orbital-data-center proposals involving approximately 1,000,000, 88,000, 51,600 and 100,000 satellites, respectively. These are proposed constellation sizes; the review states that all four were under agency review at that time. The 88,000-satellite proposal is associated with Starcloud, and the 51,600-satellite proposal with Blue Origin.

7 | What has actually flown?

Demonstrations of computing in orbit are not equivalent to large commercial orbital AI data centers. Axiom Space, Starcloud and other operators have pursued or flown small computing payloads. Some 2026 trackers list additional experiments, but operational status and hardware specifics are trade secrets.

8 | Editorial interpretation versus established fact

9 | Starlink video

Starlink system explainer:

REFERENCE MATERIAL AND EDITORIAL NOTES

1. Starlink explainer video
2. Background topics: SpaceX/Starlink FCC filings; optical intersatellite links; space-based solar power; radiative thermal management; orbital debris and collision risk; launch economics; satellite-to-device capacity.

Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand announced on Tuesday that Canada is reimposing sanctions on 11 Iranian entities with links to the Iranian nuclear and ballistic missile program or contributing to the financing of Tehran’s “malign activities.” The measure includes six fuel production and transportation companies, four banks and one insurance company. Canada lifted sanctions on these entities in 2016, after Iran signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, also known as the Iran nuclear deal. However, the Foreign Ministry noted Iran’s recent “repeated failure” to cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency, stating that the sanctions “signal Canada’s firm opposition to the financing, development and expansion of Iran’s proliferation-sensitive nuclear activities by further restricting its access to sensitive technologies and funding.”

NN: I guess Canada did not hear about the latest peace deal including nukes

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) reported on Tuesday that two “violating” tankers were abandoned in the Strait of Hormuz after a “massive” explosion caused fire. In a statement carried by Iranian media, the IRGC claimed that a supertanker struck a naval mine, after which an explosion occurred, while the second vessel, allegedly “under the protection of US aggressor warplanes,” stopped transiting the strait due to an incident and a fire. “It is worth noting that these tankers, having turned off all their navigation and identification systems, struck the fiery wall of the Strait of Hormuz and have been abandoned on the southern shores of the strait, burning,” the guard stated.

NN: Some peace deal. Their is the fiction and then their is reality. That reality has a way of biting you in the ass when you live in lala the land of fiction

Its noy about peace. Its all about the oil. And so far i don’t see any oil!

;

NN: This is Trumps declaration of war on the Democrats

Iranian lawmaker Hamidreza Gudarzi said on Monday that acquiring nuclear weapons could help deter future attacks, arguing that Tehran should reconsider its nuclear policy following the conflict with the United States and Israel. Gudarzi claimed that Iran had faced explicit nuclear threats during the conflict, particularly regarding the destruction of Pickaxe Mountain. “The enemy openly threatened us with the use of nuclear weapons, especially to destroy Pickaxe Mountain. Therefore, the best way to silence this threat is to acquire nuclear weapons, create deterrence and ensure the enemy does not even dare to threaten us,” he stressed.

NN: Could the message be any clearer!